the final authority
Foderal Court
Laredo, Texas
The Court: You may close for the government, Mr. Blask
Mr Blask: "...When we live here in this United States, every law that is w3ritten on the books applies equally to us and we must live by them. And the reason that is the case is important and msut be taken so importantly is because you are dealing with a man who has taken this stand during the time that he testified and told you, 'My name is Dr. Timothy Leary and that I am a psychologist, that I know it is wrong to possess maijuana, but I know there are certain ways that I can possess it legally and I know that if I had applied for such relief that I probalby would not have been granted it because they would have conducted investigations up in Millbrook.'
And he tells you that despite all these things, 'I am more than the law: I am Dr. Timothy Leary and the law does not apply to me'
And that is why this case is so important, because he is not above the law. None of us are.
Cognress enacted these laws in this book and they enacted the laws concerning marijuana because they felt that it was an immense danger and that is why it was there.
"....He has admitted to you that he smokes marijuana. He told you taht in 1964 or 1965, the firs titme he ever touched marijuana was in India. This is research? This is a man who tells you that 'I am above the law'. What kind of man are you dealing with? What kind of man do you ahve before you today?
You have a man that says, 'I believe in bringin up my children the old-fashioned way.' and the 'old-fashioned way', ladies and gentlemen, is to expose them to marijuana, expose them to these other drugs that he has no right to dispense. And that is what we have here.
Is that irresponsibility? I can think of no- no other situation that can be more irresponsible."
Mr. Fitzgibbon: "if Your Honor please. I thought on the questio of religion we weren't going to talk on it."
The Court: "Religion?"
Mr. Fitzgibbon: "The right to bring up our children."
Mr. Blask: "He did not have the proper order forms. There is no question about that. But he won't get a license because he knows they won't give it to him and he secretes the marijuana. That is the responsible person for you"...
The Court: "Is there anything you want to tell me at this time in your own behalf or in mitigation or extenuation?"
Defendant Leary: "No, sir."
The Court: "In that case under count wo I impose a period of confindement of twenty years and a fine of $20,000. On count three I impose a period of confinement of ten years and a fine of $20,000."
---------------------------------------- -------------------------
Mr. Blask believes that the laws written in those books are the final authority in what is wrong and what is right. Are we allowed to impose ourselves on each other, even if not all people involved agree with those laws? Are the laws we have written in books completely and unmistakenly the final word on moral righteousness? Would a complete absense of laws make more sense? Is that even possible? All views and experiences that have been imposed on us will always cloud our judgement. Because we have been raised that way, we will always see stealing as evil, we will see lying as evil, we will see the world in terms of good and evil always, unless we make the valiant effort to distance ourselves from this mindset. Can we distance ourselves from this mindset which makes us so human? Or is there some other way of looking at the world that would make us more human?
Maybe some things we experience now, like love and joy and sadness are inherently human, but arent those reactions programmed to be triggered when some action demands them to be triggered? This is a reaction programmed in us by the norm, by society. So, what IS human? Have we already found it, and should stop thinking about why our current state of life needs to be justified? Should we just swallow the pill blindly and have faith? Maybe there is a danger in thinking for yourself.
i love, i become angry, i think, i feel, i am..am i?
"This is not a war on drugs, this is a war on personal treatment" - Bill Hicks
Laredo, Texas
The Court: You may close for the government, Mr. Blask
Mr Blask: "...When we live here in this United States, every law that is w3ritten on the books applies equally to us and we must live by them. And the reason that is the case is important and msut be taken so importantly is because you are dealing with a man who has taken this stand during the time that he testified and told you, 'My name is Dr. Timothy Leary and that I am a psychologist, that I know it is wrong to possess maijuana, but I know there are certain ways that I can possess it legally and I know that if I had applied for such relief that I probalby would not have been granted it because they would have conducted investigations up in Millbrook.'
And he tells you that despite all these things, 'I am more than the law: I am Dr. Timothy Leary and the law does not apply to me'
And that is why this case is so important, because he is not above the law. None of us are.
Cognress enacted these laws in this book and they enacted the laws concerning marijuana because they felt that it was an immense danger and that is why it was there.
"....He has admitted to you that he smokes marijuana. He told you taht in 1964 or 1965, the firs titme he ever touched marijuana was in India. This is research? This is a man who tells you that 'I am above the law'. What kind of man are you dealing with? What kind of man do you ahve before you today?
You have a man that says, 'I believe in bringin up my children the old-fashioned way.' and the 'old-fashioned way', ladies and gentlemen, is to expose them to marijuana, expose them to these other drugs that he has no right to dispense. And that is what we have here.
Is that irresponsibility? I can think of no- no other situation that can be more irresponsible."
Mr. Fitzgibbon: "if Your Honor please. I thought on the questio of religion we weren't going to talk on it."
The Court: "Religion?"
Mr. Fitzgibbon: "The right to bring up our children."
Mr. Blask: "He did not have the proper order forms. There is no question about that. But he won't get a license because he knows they won't give it to him and he secretes the marijuana. That is the responsible person for you"...
The Court: "Is there anything you want to tell me at this time in your own behalf or in mitigation or extenuation?"
Defendant Leary: "No, sir."
The Court: "In that case under count wo I impose a period of confindement of twenty years and a fine of $20,000. On count three I impose a period of confinement of ten years and a fine of $20,000."
----------------------------------------
Mr. Blask believes that the laws written in those books are the final authority in what is wrong and what is right. Are we allowed to impose ourselves on each other, even if not all people involved agree with those laws? Are the laws we have written in books completely and unmistakenly the final word on moral righteousness? Would a complete absense of laws make more sense? Is that even possible? All views and experiences that have been imposed on us will always cloud our judgement. Because we have been raised that way, we will always see stealing as evil, we will see lying as evil, we will see the world in terms of good and evil always, unless we make the valiant effort to distance ourselves from this mindset. Can we distance ourselves from this mindset which makes us so human? Or is there some other way of looking at the world that would make us more human?
Maybe some things we experience now, like love and joy and sadness are inherently human, but arent those reactions programmed to be triggered when some action demands them to be triggered? This is a reaction programmed in us by the norm, by society. So, what IS human? Have we already found it, and should stop thinking about why our current state of life needs to be justified? Should we just swallow the pill blindly and have faith? Maybe there is a danger in thinking for yourself.
i love, i become angry, i think, i feel, i am..am i?
"This is not a war on drugs, this is a war on personal treatment" - Bill Hicks